We will resist Supreme Court’s out of constitute, politically motivated ruling – A. B. A Fuseini

Person in Parliament(MP) for Sagnarigu Constituency in the Northern Region Alhassan Bashir Fuseini has was adamant that the ruling by the Great Court on whether the presiding Deputy Speaker associated with Parliament can be counted to create a quorum is politically inspired. “This is a shameful, politically motivated ruling by the Judiciary. Masa this is just concept in practice their conduct does not show so and it is showing clearly by the rulings these are consistently churning out. These are reducing themselves to politics appendages. ”To the man commonly known as A. B. A Fusieni, the Supreme Court does not have any authority to misinterpret the particular constitution to suit their own politics interest. “They are tasked as the organ of authorities to interpret the law, simply no argument about that but it isn’t really their duty to misread the law, to mischievously translate the law to suit their own attention. So now are we all going to treat the Mouthpiece Speaker of Parliament as a part of Parliament or a Loudspeaker? So that when he rests in the chair we will deal with him as a Member of Parliament and not the Speaker. ”“I am telling you that our users will act accordingly and am can tell you that no one can stop us in this home from doing what we believe is proper in the attention of our democracy. ”On the actual will do in the interest from the country’s democracy, A. M. A Fuseini indicated that will “when we get to the particular bridge we will cross this. Which court ruled that will Parliament is a master from the own rules? Is it not really the Supreme court as well as the same Supreme court states the standing orders should be thrown away. Look at the double requirements. If you have these judgments originating from Judiciary, are they protecting the particular constitution? The constitution states that if anybody is presiding that person is not part of the quorum so anything that flouts the constitution we will not really allow that to remain, we will resist it, ” A. B. A Fuseini told Accra-based Joy Information. BackgroundIn a case filed in the Supreme Court by a single Justice Abdulai seeking description on whether it is right for the particular Deputy Speaker of Parliament to be counted to form a quorum when he is presiding the particular sitting, the apaex courtroom of the land ruled the Deputy Speaker of Parliament who is a Member of Parliament can be counted. The board that sat on the situation which was brought before this by one Justice Abdulai included Justices Jones Dotse, Nene Amegatcher, Prof Ashie Kotey, Mariama Owusu, Lovelace Johnson, Clemence Honyenuga, plus Emmanuel Kulendi affirmed the particular arguments of the Attorney Common. The apex court from the land also struck away portions of the standing purchases of parliament which reads“A Deputy Speaker or any additional member presiding shall not really retain his original election while presiding. ”Source: MyNewsGh. com/ 2022Send your information stories to [email protected] and via WhatsApp on +233 202452509Related Subjects: FeatureGhana